Thursday, March 24, 2011

The God of Color

The voice was loud, insistent and authoritative; and though I don't understand Hindi, I knew at once that we were in trouble.  As I turned to see who had ordered us to stop, I became painfully aware of the long, sinuous bale of concertina wire that stretched along the shoreline.  Bhim looked down at the sand and whispered to me to keep walking, but our meek attempt to ignore the order was met with an even louder barking retort which was impossible to disobey.

I had met Bhim in Delhi just a few days earlier, and he was assigned to drive me to Mathura to photograph Holi, the "festival of colors."  I had only one morning to photograph the Taj Mahal in nearby Agra, but the Yamuna river was very low, and the places I had previously photographed it from were a marshy wasteland of scrub brush and debris.  

While viewing one of those sites, I noticed a group of boys across the river, on the north side, and they appeared to be playing soccer.  The sun had already risen, but we drove to the other side and were faced with what looked like a bale of barbed wire, that seemingly had collected every wind-blown shard of paper and plastic the world could throw its way.  Then, Bhim found a small rabbit-hole in it that, if we were careful, we might be able to squirrel our way through.  He went first, and just made it, his left leg fully outstretched as he hurtled down the embankment.  There was a loud "twang," but the thin, rusted wire held.  I followed, and neither of us gave any thought as to why the wire was there, nor did we realize we had just breached the perimeter security along the river, for the Taj.

As we rounded the bank of the river, a scene unfolded that I will never forget.  In the warm, soft, hazy mist of the afterglow of sunrise, a small group of boys were kicking a soccer ball back and forth, as they did every day, with the Taj as their backdrop.  I shot exactly 7 frames, and on the last one, a boy on the left side of the frame kicked the ball into the air, and then...

Apparently we had been spotted from a tower, and now, I listened with no small amusement to the argument going back and forth between Bhim and the guards.  I knew where this was going, and turned my back, as I watched Bhim pull out his wallet to give them his guide card.   After 5 more minutes we we told to leave, and I looked back one last time at a view of the Taj I had never seen before and never would, again.  Of all the images I have made in India, it remains my favorite.

Boys playing soccer in front of the Taj Mahal

Just a few days before, I had collapsed in a chair, exhausted from an afternoon of photographing Indians and foreigners in the throes of exuberant joy, throwing colored powder at each other, and laughing at the fun of having themselves doused with one color after another until they themselves were walking canvases of modern art.  Now, as I took  off my I.C.P. hat hat and threw it on the ground, I had some sense of how I must look. I had been the target of several children and adults, all them them gleefully pouring handful after handful of powder on me, until my eyes, my ears, my nose, my hands, my mouth, and every other part of my body had some spectral value assigned to it.

My I.C.P. hat, post "Holi"

I was only one of several photographers drawn to Holi who subjected themselves and their equipment to a daily ritual of wrapping camera gear in various layers of protective plastic, some jury rigged and some far more elaborate.  Yet no matter how carefully the gear was protected, a number of cameras and lenses fell victim to the onslaught of giggling children with plastic water "cannons," and adults who might be under under the influence of "Bhang".  Along with the revelers, I was one of those who received a direct hit to my eyes, of a handful of color; and it would later take hours, and several showers, to begin to wash the color off my skin.


Victim of a Holi color dust storm tries to get it out of her eyes


Imagine being thrown into a mammoth blender, along with several tons of colored talcum powder, and the switch is thrown to "high." Even the silvery steps leading up to Lord Krishna's throne were spattered with color, and the more you got with the program ("Happy Holi !"), the more you were accepted as a bona fide colorista.  

Lord Krishna's staircase

The conditions for making images could not have been worse—it was very hot, and the temple courtyards were filled with relentless, raw, mid-day sunlight. Add to that the constant dust clouds of colored powder, children squirting powerful jets of colored water, add in constant, loud, raucous music, and it was impossible to imagine making any images, let along finding places to shoot. Yet if one looked, there were many images to be made, and I found a haven underneath the walkways which surrounded the temple courtyard.  I was not the only one trying to escape the onslaught to my senses, and it was here that it was possible to make some startling portraits, and abstract close-ups of color spattered shirts and faces.  What I found interesting was not the spectacle, but the way in which Holi became a manifestation of "man as art," in which the human body became a canvas.  When I went to India in 2007 to make photographs for my book INDIA: In Word and Image, I made my first images of Holi, and became aware that Lord Krishna is India's "God of Color."
Colored water cannons for sale on the streets of Mathura

Likenesses of Lord Krishna for sale in a stall, Mathura

Portrait #1, Holi

Portrait #2, Holi






Shirt #1

Shirt #2

Back of Black Blouse

The crowd filling the temple in anticipation


Yet Holi, and the celebration of color, was a world apart from the man I had photographed just the day before at the Jama Masjid—India's largest mosque—in the old part of Delhi. Quietly, in the large, open prayer hall, the man cupped his hands to Allah, the only sound the echo of my camera's shutter off the sandstone walls.

Praying to Allah, in the Jama Masjid, Delhi

Day after day of photographing Holi took its toll on my gear as well as my lungs.  By the end of the third day I was coughing spontaneously, in a deep, uncontrolled need to get the dust out of my lungs.  I spent hours each night using Q-Tips to clean my cameras, and rewrapped each camera in a clear plastic bag that I tied tightly around the lens, which had a high quality UV filter on it.  I was drained—from the dust, from the ritual of cleaning the cameras, and from the need to take 3 showers each night before all the color was washed off.  So we drove to Agra and Jaipur to "recharge my batteries, and went to places I hadn't been to before, such as Sikandra, near Agra.  

Woman in red sari walking in hallway, Sikandra  (near Agra)

Marble detail, Sikandra 

The last time I had been in Jaipur, the Palace of the Winds was in scaffolding, and the lake surrounding the Jal Mahal was completely dried up.  Fortunately, the scaffolding had been taken down, and heavy rains had filled the lake.  I also went to the City Palace, and spent an amusing twenty minutes watching tourist after tourist bend down and photograph the courtyard from an intricately carved arch above the entrance.
Tourist with point-and-shoot camera, City Palace (Jaipur)

Detail of Peacock, City Palace (Jaipur)

Palace of the Winds (Hal Mahal), Jaipur

The Jal Mahal, on the outskirts of Jaipur

On the outskirts of Jaipur, I photographed large, hanging bolts of freshly dyed cloth.  And on the banks of the Yamuna, I found hundreds of freshly washed saris drying in the sun.
Freshly dyed cloth drying in the sun

Washed saris, drying by the side of the Yamuna river

At my hotel in Agra, I photographed this large, intricately engraved brass door, as well as the large, open vases of fresh rose petals that were placed everywhere.  And little by little, I absorbed the tranquility.  I needed it, because India can be overwhelming, and the celebration of Holi is an opportunity for Indians to abandon all restraint.
Detail, Brass door

Rose petals floating in hotel vase

Detail of cloth adorning an elephant, Jaipur

Star Spangled Blue Elephant, Jaipur

I went back to Mathura for one last day, but this time I photographed on the streets—from a rickshaw, and on foot.  A man standing in a doorway, with magnificent light bouncing off his cheeks. Another man asleep in the shadows of an archway. Marigolds and rose petals sprinkled on a floor.  And, in the late evening light, a man that everyone seemed to know, the "cloak room" man—who called out to everyone and, in his easy banter, seemed to be everything that India is about.  

It was getting time to head back to Delhi, to get on a plane for a fifteen hour flight to JFK.  Yet I couldn't stop thinking about those boys playing soccer in front of the Taj, and the serendipity I had in finding that place, and in making that image. I wanted to be there right now.  I wanted to see it all, again. I looked at Bhim, coughed, got in the car, and we started on the long ride back to Delhi.

The Man in the Doorway, Mathura


Man sleeping in shadows, Mathura

Marigold and rose petals on a floor, Mathura

The "Cloak Room" Man, Mathura















Sunday, February 27, 2011

The Black Wall

It’s 6:10AM on a cold and rainy Monday, and I’m on a bus headed into New York to get a visa so I can return again to India.  Soon, spring will be here, and the wild rites of the festival of “Holi” will erupt in a fusillade of color-drenched powder, oils, and water.  I leave in just a few days, yet my mind is not on what images I might make, but on the disconnect between how "fine art" photography is defined by museums, galleries, collectors, auction houses, historians and...photographers.
I’m thinking, in particular, about ninety-nine cents.  99 cents ?   OK, type 99 cents into Google, followed by the word photograph.
Here’s what comes up:
Andreas Gursky, 99 Cent II Diptychon (2001), February 2007, Sotheby's London auction. A print sold for $2.48 million in November 2006 at a New York gallery, and another print sold for $2.25 million at Sotheby's in May 2006. 
Yes, ironically, a photograph with the title “99 Cents” is one of the most expensive photographs in the world.  And, it’s in color, not black-and-white.  The George Eastman House can't afford one.  But, would they want one?
I grew up at a time when photography was defined by such diverse and well-known names as Edward Weston, Hiro, Eliott Erwitt, and Ernst Haas.  I own a first edition, signed copy of Eliot Porter’s landmark book, The Place No One Knew. I am fortunate to have some of my favorite images on my walls: a print of Jay Maisel’s “Blue Wall and Doves,” hangs on one  wall, and Pete Turner’s “Ethiopian Bar” hangs on another.
A few months ago, at Jay’s studio, he said to me, “We sell a lot of prints.”  Print making—and defining one’s legacy through gallery sales—has become the new measure of the worth and the arc of a career. Modern colorists, such as the documentary photographer Edward Burtynsky, have seen no need to have a career other than one that begins and ends with one’s personal work, and personal projects.  Those photographers whose work I grew up with, supported themselves with commercial work and assignments, much as I did.  In the hectic “down time”—the moments in between assignments—we all made the images which gave meaning to our love of photography, and on which we built our careers and our legacies.  And, ultimately, it is those images that determine the footnotes that are written in the histories of photography.  
Recently, I looked at a great new portfolio of wildlife images from Tanzania by a friend, Rob Ross; the imagery crossed the magic boundary that separates photographs from merely being a record of what was in front of the camera; his new images were at once lyrical and mysterious.  The best of the images made you want to see more, and more. Yet, I think we all have moments where we are frustrated with photography and how much it depends on capturing an exact moment in time, rather than manufacturing one.  The presumption--that photography is about truth and recording what the camera (in the hands of the photographer) captures—is a limitation of photography, for me; or at least the presumption that photography has to have some innate, or inherent "meaning."  In the paradigm we have grown up with, photography is not about Franz Kline, or Mark Rothko, or Jackson Pollack.
The abstract expressionist work of photographers such as Aaron Siskind, Hiroshi Sugimoto and Carl Chiarenza, is, for many people, discomforting if it has the word "photography" attached to it.   Yet their images are seductive, even if most people look at Harry Callahan's more abstract studies of light and don't equate those images with photography.  Light, form, and shadow, reduced to just that and nothing more...what is it that gives us such discomfort, yet  leads me to make my own (increasingly) abstract images?
The answer to that question, for me, is simply that I love seeing what I never saw before, and that I no longer feel there needs to be a “subject” in photography, other than light and color.  While in Mexico, last week, I came across a very long, undulating black wall; and, as I walked by it, a prismatic, refractive glint of sunlight caught my eye.  Everyone was walking by, oblivious to a world of color buried in the dichroic glass embedded in the tiles.  If you looked straight on to the wall, it appeared dense black—especially in the blinding sunlight; yet if you moved the slightest bit to either side, the wall erupted in a pointillistic burst of electric color.  Eighty feet of pitch blackness; and eighty feet of color unlike anything I have ever seen before.
Eloquent as he was as a photographer, Ernst Haas was also a master of words and ideas.  Speaking of his love  of abstraction, he once said “I am not interested in shooting new things—I am interested to see things new.”
                                                                                                               Wall of Colored Glass, Mexico 2011  © Eric Meola



                                                                                                                        Spinning Lights, Florida 2011   © Eric Meola




                                                                                                                             Sign Detail,  State Fair 2011   © Eric Meola




                                                                                                               Light on Staircase, Canada 2010   © Eric Meola 




                                                                                                        Reflections in Skyscraper, NYC 2010   © Eric Meola 




                                                                                              Waterfall and Oxidized Rock, Iceland 2010   © Eric Meola




                                                                                                                      Rusted Truck, California 2009   © Eric Meola




                                                                                                   Rusted Car, Oregon  2009   © Eric Meola



                                                                           Detail, Hotel Floor  Vermont 2010   © Eric Meola 2010



                                                                                                  Reflection in Window, Las Vegas 2010   © Eric Meola

Friday, December 3, 2010

Canon's New 70-300mm "L" Lens

When I started this blog, I deliberately decided not to write anything about gear, especially cameras and lenses.  As a Canon "Explorer of Light," I think my judgments can be looked at with a certain amount of skepticism.  More importantly, all of the online pixel peeping and blogging about gear has created an obsession with perfection.  Many of the greatest images ever made were taken with manually focused lenses, well before the age of auto focus or  auto aperture, let alone image stabilization.

Occasionally, a piece of gear comes along which is quietly revolutionary, and in that regard, Canon's new 70-300mm "L" lens is, to say the least, extraordinary.  Yesterday I went into New York with the intention of shooting some test shots to show just what this lens is capable of producing.  

A few caveats: all these images were made on a 7D body, which is not full frame.  Is the lens equally as sharp corner to corner on FF ?  Honestly, I haven't tested it yet on the 5D2.  On the 7D, at the 300mm end, it has an effective focal length of 480mm.

Though I shot some images wide open, I deliberately chose apertures of anywhere from f/8 to f/22 for many of the shots as I wanted depth of field when I wasn't shooting parallel to a building.  The first image here, was shot at f/13 and 1/45th of a second.  You read that right.  1/45th second, 480mm focal length.  Hand held.

Besides being the sharpest zoom I have ever used—whether from Canon or Nikon—there is no visible barrel or pincushion distortion at any focal length, nor is there any chromatic aberration.  And yes, shooting at f/13 should be way beyond the "diffraction limit" of the 7D's 1.6X sensor.  So much for theory.  

This lens is a tank.  Relatively short, thick, and somewhat heavy.  Yet compared to, say, the 70-200mm f/2.8, it's a "baby."  

There is one thing, though, that sets this lens apart—I can hand hold it, CONSISTENTLY, at 1/30th second and get sharp images.  The image stabilization of this lens, combined with its balance, shortness and heft, put it beyond the Twilight Zone of reason.  There are some lenses that are examples of the best art and science of optical design.  The Zeiss 21mm f/2.8 Distagon is one, as is the Nikon 14-24mm zoom.

Obviously, I feel that the Canon 70-300mm "L" is in that league.  For the first time ever, I can shoot at an effective focal length of 480mm, at 1/45th or 1/30th of a second, and get extremely sharp, distortion-free images.

Yes, I know, you want to know about "bokeh," or how it does wide open, or full frame, or...well, like I said, this is not supposed to be an analytical examination about "line pairs" of resolution.  This is one sharp lens that makes it easy for me to make images that I could never make before.  That's more than good enough for me: Canon 70-300mm L.


















Thursday, August 5, 2010

"TR" and the First 79

On Monday, August 9th, former Syracuse University professor Tom Richards ("TR") turns 79.  Mentor to a generation of photographers who have made their mark on modern photography, Richards taught and befriended such photographers as Stephen Wilkes, Seth Resnick, Bob Sacha, Clint Clemens, Ed Kashi, Nancie Battaglia, Walter P. Calahan, Nancy Leigh, and myself, as well as Sean Callahan, the founder of American Photographer magazine, which, for the ten years he edited it, was a substantially different magazine than its successor, American Photo.  

Among us, we've published more than a dozen books, on subjects ranging from a biography of Margaret Bourke-White, to a book on Ellis Island, and one on India; photographed luminaries such as Bill Gates and Bruce Springsteen; and worked for magazines ranging from Life to Time.  Seth Resnick's workshops on digital imaging, Bob Sacha's numerous photo essays for National Geographic, and Clint Clemens' groundbreaking use of computers in his photography—all of them have in common the influence, the teaching, and the drive of the man behind those two initials, "TR."
I took a course in color printing and color theory from Tom, in the late Sixties, but my own recollections of that time remain myopic—blurred with the passage of time, much like the Vaseline filters that were the rage in those days, along with fisheye lenses and LSD.   Yes, "TR" had me pegged.  'Timothy Leary?   Doctor Timothy Leary?  What kind of doctor is he?' he would ask sarcastically as he dashed up the back stairwells of Newhouse  1  between his third floor office and the lab, his white lab coat flapping in his wake. recall working for the student newspaper, photographing the FBI photographing the Berrigan brothers (renegade priests and anti-war activists), and being pinned against a wall by TR almost every day, in a jovial bout of questioning about some arcane corner of photographic technology.  One time he started rattling off Wratten filter numbers and asking me to describe their color--#12, 15, 21, 23, 25, 32, 47, 58...we kept going for 5 minutes, when he got all the way up to #102 and flashed his schoolboy grin at me, his eyes sparkling, and his eyebrows arched as if to say "Gotcha Meola !"   Until I simply looked at him with no emotion and said "lime green."


Those encounters have stayed with me to this day. Friend and former magazine editor (now retired, but currently Adjunct Professor at SU) Sean Callahan, had these thoughts about this particular side of TR: "His exercise with you with the Wratten filters is a good example of the level he would go to challenge the individual. I doubt that he would do that to any other student, even a grad student, because it is pretty arcane stuff. Tom didn't mind taking on the challenge you were as a student, and actually relished it because he had made his mark in the profession, so he was comfortable as a practitioner. I believe this gave him the foundation to be a creative teacher."


Yet, to be honest, in those days I was far more concerned with being drafted. I only had one eye on photography; my real focus was what was going on in Vietnam.  I was a full blown child of the Sixties.  Again, Sean, who somehow has maintained more brain cells than I from those heady times, recalls the following about my introduction to TR:


"An English major with thoughts about being a writer (NOT a photographer), you were a live-at-home townie with little interest in campus activity until you responded to my call for help at the 'Daily Orange' (S.U.'s student newspaper) and you presented yourself with a list of hardware that was more modern and extensive than anything in the newspaper’s darkroom. ('What the *#@^*%#@??? is a Macbeth Quantalog Densitometer used for?')


I kept prodding you to take a course with TR at the J-school and you only agreed to meet with him when I made the argument that you could easily boost your grade point average with a photo course.  I had sung your praises to TR prior to the meeting, and don’t recall what transpired between you, other than he had to get department head Fred Demarest’s OK since you obviously were going to have to come in at an advanced level and work in color (Fred’s domain.)"
One of my photo heroes at the time was Ernst Haas, and when he was invited to talk at S.U., I was front and center.  Haas was renowned for introducing color to magazine photography, notably in Life, in the early 1950s with his sometimes lyrical imagery.  Of particular note was an essay he shot on bullfighting in Spain using the original Kodachrome (ASA 10) and slow shutter speeds to create some remarkable (for the time) impressionistic images. Haas' appearance obviously had the effect on his students that TR hoped for.Shortly thereafter, I got an assignment from the the yearbook editor to show the university's diversity. With refrains in my ears of TR's mantra to always look for a new way of seeing something that might be tried and true, I took a young Nigerian exchange student out to the newly constructed terminal at Syracuse's airport, and panned the camera as he ran against a bright red, enameled brick wall, his native robes unfurling in the wind.  It was the first time I knew I had caught TR's attention, and that I felt I had made a leap in the way I saw.

TR's edgy irreverence with students always came with a demanding playfulness. He constantly challenged you to make better pictures—sometimes even in competition with himself. Just to keep his edge, TR would be the AP stringer for SU football games. (This was the Floyd Little/LarryCzonka era when SU was always in newsworthy contention for NCAA glory.) TR would help qualified students get sideline credentials. Sean sometimes got a credential for UPI, thereby putting him elbow-to-elbow with TR during the game. TR would heckle him all during the game but never offered any guidance.  This was, after all, the real world, and the student needed to learn to survive in it.  Later he would ask to see the student's take and offer helpful criticism, albeit sardonically delivered.

As Sean recalls, "Perhaps the biggest event of my sophomore year was the week I beat TR to the Sunday NYTimes sports page. That was the only time UPI edged AP in Syracuse that season but it was enough for me. TR grudgingly mentioned it in class the next week, claiming it was an example of egregious photo editing. I beamed and it was obvious that he was proud, too—but not too obvious about it such that I would get cocky."

Photographer Ed Kashi, got a taste of another side of TR:
“I have many memories of TR, and not all of them are easy or pleasant. He never made me feel a part of the group and was, I felt, quite tough on me. But what he did was prepare me for a life in photography.  When I was a senior and about to graduate, I asked him to write me a letter of recommendation. What I got back was unusable. He basically ripped me apart in that letter. It was a sobering lesson for what was about to come as I entered the 'real world' of professional photography.
TR was also a very kind man, generous and strong. If he liked you, there was no end to what he would do for you. My sense is that he expected people to give it their all and learn what it meant to be mature and professional. His judgment of me, way back then, was probably good for me. He kept me honest and humbled; and forced me to conjure up my inner strength and resolve, which prepared me for the future. His tough expectations were a good thing for an undisciplined, but eager, kid.”
Here are recollections of other former students who stand in TR's debt: